Hopefully the few of you who read this blog know that I am just starting out with my camera. Recently, I bought a prime lens (Nikkor 50mm 1.8). I had heard so much about it (and it's more expensive brother, the 1.4) and read so many posts of adoring photographers complete with all their amazing portraits; all compliments of their "nifty fifty". So I have had high hopes of my new little lens. Unfortunately, I don't really know what I'm doing. Trial by error to be sure, with emphasis on the error. I suppose I thought that if a wide aperture is good, then why not open it up all the way baby! Perhaps hundreds of blurry, grainy, fuzzy photos will emphasize to me the relationship between aperture, shutter speed and ISO. I can't just focus on one of the three and forget about the others. Maybe pay attention to how much light I have, if the subject is moving around, stuff like that? Did you know that not everything should be shot at an f-stop of 1.8? Did you know that there is a time and place for it? Slow learner, that's me. I don't even want to show you all my "bad examples" ...
... but, here it goes. I'm not saying that either of these are at all good, they are not (yuck). They are both SOOC (straight out of camera). Might as well show as it is. But this is the exact same shot at the same time but in different settings.
Shot 1: f: 4.5, 1/80 sec, ISO 200
Shot 2: f: 1.8, 1/4000 sec, ISO 1000


So those of you reading this who have some words of advice (or condolences), let me have them. How do you manage with your prime lens? Tell me how you decide what aperture to use. In the interest of having at least one good shot, I'm tempted to turn my dial back to "auto".